These things are always tricky, especially when we have so little to go on—this case being a few sentences on a note from the jury. But if we want to conduct the exercise, this is what I see.
The jury note indicates this particular juror is most likely a Female Red Authoritarian. That is not the best news for Kyle Rittenhouse.
They place faith in authority to protect self and society, believe in and are focused on control, and extol the virtues of obedience.
The use of the word "Please" when requesting the information is not an argument against a Red, but rather more likely due to deference to and respect for authority. Further, in Question Number 4 (included), the Red in her overwhelms deference when she gets right to the point requesting succinctly (decisiveness/control) the items she requires.
The "control" element is clear in the notice instructing the court to prepare the requested information with a clarification that they will "request when ready", meaning this juror does not want them to interrupt deliberations until they are ready.
The jury was instructed that the court needs time to prepare requested information. However, there's a clear need for control, both of the deliberation and of the flow of information in deliberations.
UPDATE: As was pointed out, her deference is crystal clear by her mimicking of the prosecution's manner of phrasing the fire extinguisher. She is siding with the prosecution on the version of events surrounding the extinguisher, i.e. put down vs. dropped.
In sum, the items requested indicate she's trying to find ill intent in his actions, something to reenforce her belief that Kyle Rittenhouse was wrong by virtue of being there, and is hoping the moments right before and after will sway jurors who are for acquittal. It's a search for something to affirm the version of the story that we all tell ourselves and which is informed by our beliefs, not facts or evidence.
I feel like tearing off my clothes and dancing in the rain (snow on Tuesday). Ofc I'm entirely too old to do that. But...
We were SO right.
Here's Snoop, who rapped "F--K Donald Trump" in 2017, now performing at a Trump supporting inauguration party.
Watch Live 3:00 PM EST — Robert Barnes and Rich Baris discuss in detail bombshell results within the Public Polling Project for Early Spring 2021, and more civil unrest amid the trial of Derek Chauvin for the death of George Floyd.
Support the Public Polling Project
https://www.bigdatapoll.com/public-polling-project/
Locals Communities
https://peoplespundit.locals.com/
https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/
Like on Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/PeoplesPunditDaily
Follow on Twitter
https://twitter.com/Peoples_Pundit
https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law
Theme Song: "Highway" By Grammy Considered Bowen Band
https://www.chrisbowenband.com/
Sunday Strip from Dr Malone - A Sombrero on a Pig - Is still a pig:
https://www.malone.news/p/sunday-strip-a-sombrero-on-a-pig
U lose ur career and job for this piece of shit
Can u imagine the stupidity
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/10/breaking-fbi-agent-fired-refusing-arrest-perp-walk/
Would love to get Rich's perspective on Hunt entering the Texas R Senate Primary. I could see this going three ways:
1. Hunt splits the anti-Cornyn vote with Paxton, helps Cornyn
2. Hunt flops, get little/no voters or only those who wouldn't have voted for either Cornyn/Paxton, neutral/no impact on race
3. Hunt splits establishment vote, helps Paxton
I think 2 is the most likely scenario. Paxton has a pretty solid base of support because he is so well-known and loved by the MAGA base in Texas and Hunt is a nobody. I follow Texas politics pretty closely and never heard of Hunt before.
1 is possible but unlikely unless Paxton runs a horrible campaign that gives Hunt the opportunity to contest the the MAGA base. The MAGA base is Paxton's to lose. Trump endorsing and campaigning for Cornyn could make it harder for Paxton, but I doubt that will happen because there is so much bad blood between Trump and Cornyn due to Cornyn backstabbing Trump in 2020 and publicly opposing him leading up to 2024 ...
Watching people attempt to "unskew" polls conducted by all walks of this industry—ranging from Nate Cohn at The New York Times to Spencer Kimball at Emerson College to Tim Malloy at Quinnipiac—all to deny Donald Trump's gains against Joe Biden with various voting blocs, is more than a little sad.
The slew of recent polls over two weeks—to include no less than four today alone—have simply confirmed prior findings published from other pollsters who have previously been "unskewed". That includes your's truly and our work at BIG DATA POLL, Mark Penn at Harvard University, Patrick Ruffini at Echelon Insights, and many others.
I'm temped to equate this with an Occam's razor-like situation. But this debate is more about likelihood than simplicity.
Here's the Presidential Vote Preference Trend for Biden v. Trump going back to August 2020. The Public Polling Project did not begin asking the Rematch Question for 2024 until September 2021. However, we can still make some pretty important and interesting observations.